INTRODUCTION
There are many threads and layers of economic and political agendas working towards a global order. These ideas are no longer mere concepts of the tin foil hat conspiracy theorists, but rather published and documented fact. Much of the carrying out of these agenda’s happen unbeknownst to the general public because the systems and procedures are rigged to be discreet, and a majority of the time, hidden under the veil of what appears to be progress. It’s no accident that the majority of the public, especially in America are distracted with “Dancing withe the Stars”, reality tv, and celebrity drama. So while many people are frying their brains with mindless television, alcohol consumption, drugs, parties, and social narcissim, the small group of elite men have been constructing what will be a global grid that will lock down and eventually enslave us.
On this post, I want to begin a deeper investigation on the topic of Technocracy. I believe Technocracy is a large part of an unspoken agenda that will help construct a totalitarian system that could well be the culprit in forming a one world economic system and therefore a one world government. From this global grid and technocratic structure, I believe the transhumanist movement will ultimately formulate what Christians know as the Mark of the Beast. But before I do, I want to lay down the reason why I believe this system is ultimately sinister and a product of a far darker spiritual agenda than most believe or want to believe.
WORLD GOVERNMENT IN PROPHECY
My belief is that the bible is the inerrant Word of God; God verifying Himself by writing history before it happens. As such, it should be the foundation for the things we see happening in the world around us. And so when we look at history and the events leading up to our current global temperament, it should line up in one form or another with what is described in bible prophecy.
Most people, both Christians and non-believers recognize that various passages have been interpreted to describe a one world government, economy and religion to bestow the earth in the end times. I did my best to study these subjects with a clean slate when I began my prophecy study a couple years ago. But after digging into it, I came to similar conclusions as many who came before about a one world economic, political, and religious system in the end times.
Daniel 7:15-24
“I, Daniel, was grieved in my spirit within my body, and the vision of my head troubles me. I came near to one of those who stood by, and asked him the truth of all this. So he told me and made known to me the interpretation of these things: Those great beasts, which are four, are four kings which arise out of the earth. But the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom, and possess the kingdom forever, even forever and ever. Then I wished to know the truth about the fourth beast, which was different from all the others, exceedingly dreadful, with its teeth of iron and its nails of bronze, which devours, broke in pieces, and trampled the residue with its feet: and the ten horns that were on its head, and the other horn which came up, before which three fell, namely, that horn which had eyes and a mouth which spoke pompous words, whose appearance was greater than his fellows. I was watching; and the same horn was making war against the saints, and prevailing against them, until the Ancient of Days came, and a judgment was made in favor of the saints of the Most High, and the time came for the saints to possess the kingdom. Thus he said: ‘The fourth beast shall be A fourth kingdom on earth, Which shall be different from all other kingdoms, And shall devour the whole earth, trample it and break it in pieces. The ten horns are ten kinds Who shall arise from this kingdom. And anther shall rise after them; He shall be different from the first ones, And shall subdue three kings. He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall be given into his hand for a time and times and half a time.” (emphasis mine)
Now this passage comes after Daniel has a dream and a vision about the future. I don’t want to go through the entire passage, but to highlight some key points, I would like to begin with, “those great beasts, which are four, are four kinds which arise out of the earth.” The first thing to point out is that Daniel here echoes a vision and dream king Nebuchadnezzar had in an earlier chapter of Daniel. The one stark difference is that Nebuchadnezzar saw them from the perspective of man, which were earthly kingdoms described as a brilliant statue, noble and desired. Daniel on the other hand, saw these kingdoms from the perspective of God. Beasts! So the great beasts here are the four kingdoms as confirmed later in Daniel 7:24. The key is that they arise out of the earth. In other words, these kingdoms will be the product of human construct and not the establishment of God.
Daniel goes onto focus in the the fourth beast. “Then I wished to know the truth about the fourth beast, which was different from all the others, exceedingly dreadful, with its teeth of iron and its nails of bronze, which devours, broke in pieces, and trampled the residue with its feet.” Now it’s obvious that this fourth beast was going to be the most destructive, not only to the saints, or believers, but also to the entire world. This is one of many reasons I don’t hold onto the pre-tribulation rapture of the church, but that’s a rabbit trail meant for another day.
What I find interesting about this passage is that it refers to how it devours, then, “broke in pieces, and trampled the residue with its feet.” The word for devour in the Hebrew “‘akal” means literally, “to eat, to devour, eat their pieces.” I can also mean “to consume.” The word that describes “broke into pieces,” comes from the Hebrew word “deqaq”, which means “to shatter”, but also has it’s roots in the Hebrew word “hadak” which means “to tread down, or cast down”. And finally, the trampling of it’s residue with it’s feet is an illustration of how this system will use it’s strength to stomp down on the world.
So if we can paraphrase these verses after taking a look at some key words in the original text, we can say that this final beast or kingdom, is going to take over the earth, tread on it or lock it down, and then eventually enforce this lock down. Now there is a lot I left out with the little horn as the Antichrist, and the possible connection to this beast and Rome, and several other interpretations made with this particular text and others of a similar elk. But the main reason why I wanted to use this passage to set up Technocracy, was to show how bible prophecy describes the characteristics of the fourth beast, or final earthly kingdom so that we can compare it to the current agendas in forming a technocratic society.
SHORT HISTORY OF TECHNOCRACY
Technocracy in the united States was a short lived movement born in the 1930′s in the wake of the Great Depression. The engineers, scientists and technicians of that day formed a group called Technocracy Incorporated, still in existence today, which suggested an energy-based economic system that would drive out capitalism and create equal distribution of energy. Although Technocracy is not a well known term today, it was a very popular movement nearly a century ago. In fact, Aldous Huxley and George Orwell both echoe some of these technocratic principles in their respective works, “A Brave New World” and “1984.”
The roots of this movement can be traced back to a man named Howard Scott who in the mid 1910′s brought together a group of economists, engineers and scientists in an attempt to create a research organization. While this group was known as the Technical Alliance through the 1920′s, it was the official forming of the group Technocracy Incorporated in 1933 that took the U.S. by storm. While the movement itself died out within a decade due to the advent of WWII, the principles did not. And as I will show in this post and posts to come, this may be the foundation in forming a global economy that will require a global government and thereby a leader for that government.
WHAT DID EARLY TECHNOCRATS BELIEVE?
A twenty page pamphlet published in 1939 by Technocracy Incorporated entitled, Technocracy in Plain Terms: A Challenge and a Warning, answers this question and other elements of what the technocratic ideologies are [1]. In the document four questions are answered to help readers understand the movement. Here are the questions and a brief synopsis of each answer:
1. What is Technocracy?
According to their own writings, technocracy is a system of social management, purely based on scientific principles and what they call, “incontrovertible scientific facts.” In other words, because politicians and bankers only have their own interest in mind, they neglect the scientific understanding of the world and the people thereby, and therefore, by implementing these principles into a system of governance, we can stay true to the laws of nature, and therefore prosper.
What is it designed to do?
In essence, because technocracy is the application of science to the social order, it would streamline methods of production and distribution of all goods and services. They would accomplish this by harnessing energy production and distribution. In so doing, they will be able to create a cash-less society, that is sustainable through the technologies and sciences.
How will it function?
The best way to get our heads around this one is to quote them directly. On page eight of this document, it states quote, “In a Technate there are no such things as trading or working for wages. We have such an abundance of goods available now that they can no longer be exchanged or bought or sold…Money cannot be used, and its function of purchasing must be replaced by a scientific unit of measurement”[2]. In other words, the elimination of not just capitalism, but rather a trade based economic system. This sounds a lot like the Venus Project promoted by the Zeigeist Movement.
Will it be satisfactory to all concerned?
Again, no words can adequately describe the answer to this question without quoting them. On page nine, it states quote, “Even the most hardboiled and hardest to suit would probably come to like living under a Technate. At any rate it is quite possible that you would have to take it whether you liked it or not…The only way to avoid enjoying all these things…would be to commit suicide or leave the country permanently”[3]. Very strong words here. Essentially, the proponents of Technocracy are suggesting that this scientific dictatorship is inevitable. More disturbing is that fact that they mention suicide, or leaving the country as the only means to avoid the Technocratic society.
In the concluding remarks of the document, these Technocracy advocates state, “Tecnocracy shows how a high-energy civilization on this Continent today made a Price System unworkable, and that the only System that is workable is functional control and direct and equal distribution-without a Price…Of course, ‘If enough of us understoof the inevitability of Technocracy and were prepared to act, we could have it right now, without having to wait and go through the hell that may otherwise check the evolutionary struggle of mankind to reach the much-to-be-desired state of peace, security, leisure, and plenty that is now within our grasp.’” [4]
It is eerie to see the language used in the final paragraph where the goal once again is a “much-to-be-desired state of peace, security, leisure, and plenty…”. The true colors of Technocracy are apparent in these remarks. This ideology is no different than the Luceferian Doctrine that man would become god by the use of our own intellect. It is no different than the pursuit of peace in our physical world, brought about by our own knowledge. It is no different than what Gearge Bush senior declared as the desire for the New World Order to achieve, “peace, security, freedom, and the rule of law.”
TECHNOCRACY IN THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION
I find it ironic that those who propose The Venus Project being promoted by the Zeigeist Movement are supporting the same people who they are claiming to be exposing in the conspiracy world. This becomes increasingly evident when we find out some very interesting facts about the origin of the Trilateral Commission and how it is playing a large part in establishing a global Technocracy.
Go to any conspiracy theory website and you will find the rantings and ravings of conspiracy theorists going on and on about the Trilateral Commision. But few can elaborate why. Here is the deal. The Trilateral Commission have been been proponents of Technocracy all along. Their current developments are under the guise of helping to solve global warming, and the energy crisis by forming a global energy control grid currently called the Smart Grid. I hope to get into the details of this development in future posts, but for now I want to get into the building blocks of the Trilateral Commision in light of the Technocratic agenda.
The Trilateral Commission was founded by two people, David Rockefeller, and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Now many people know about the Rockefeller’s and their tremendous wealth and influence on society, especially out in the west. But really the foundation of the Trilateral Commission was built on the writings of Zbigniew Brzezinski.
In 1970, three years before the Trilateral Commission was formed, Zbigniew Brzezinski, published a book entitled, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era. In it, Brzezinski outlines his views of how a Technocratic form of governance will be the most beneficial for the future of human well being. He formulates his idea by laying out three of what he calls “Domestic priorities,” in the advent of technological transitions. These three domestic priorities according to Brzezinski is quote,”The need for an institutional realignment of American democracy to enhance social responsiveness and blur traditional distinctions between governmental and nongovernmental social processes; the need for anticipatory institutions to cope with the unintended consequences of technological-scientific change; the need for educational reforms to mitigate the effects of generational and racial conflicts and promote rational humanist values in the emerging new society.” [5] (Emphasis mine)
He goes on to explain that the global priorities are the same stating quote, “The international equivalents of our domestic needs are similar: the gradual shaping of a community of developed nations would be realistic expression of our emerging global consciousness; concentrating on disseminating scientific and technological knowledge would reflect a more functional approach to man’s problems, emphasizing ecology rather than ideology; both the foregoing would help to encourage the spread of a more personalized rational humanist world outlook that would gradually replace the institutional religious, ideological, and intensely national perspectives that have dominated modern history.” [6] (Emphasis mine)
In other words, what the world needs is a system of governance in place that would promote the humanist values and break down the national barriers that divide us. These barriers, according to Brzezinski, are institutional religion and intense ideological forms of nationalism. But notice his attitude that a Technocratic society is a foregone conclusion. In other words, similar to the document from Technocracy Incorporated in 1939, Brzezinski’s contention is that science and technology is going to take over as the ultimate sociological construct in human governance. Therefore, if these priorities are not put in place, we can expect to see more problems and turmoil in the wake of such advancements and developments. It is also interesting to note that every writing that describes or advocates a Utopian future, whether it be Alice Bailey, Manly P. Hall and their occult writings, or a man like Brzezinski, the problem is always reduced to institutional religion.
If we can hearken back to the prophecy in Daniel, the fourth beast would come from the earth. In other words, it would be a system that appeals to worldly acclaims, not Godly ones. And what Brzezinski provides is exactly that. He is quite honest about his humanist worldview, but ironically has to borrow Judeo-Christian ethics to make his argument against it. Nevertheless, it is clear that if such an influencial global organization like the Trilateral Commission is founded on these humanistic principles, and suggests such a global system to solve human shortcomings, then perhaps bible prophecy in the book of Daniel and other prophetic passage are correct. Perhaps what appears to be a solution for humanity is really a beast, seeking out destruction.
CONCLUSION
Much like the eugenics movement that has quietly changed it’s facade to “genetic enhancement research,” technocracy never actually went away. It has just changed names, and faces. It’s quite clear that the world most powerful and influencial people are behind such an agenda. They see the benefits of creating a global economy with energy based currency rigged with a global monitoring systems.
In part 2, we will dig into how these concepts are actually being put into place by the global elite. We will look at whats called the Global Smart Grid and how it is being constructed right before our eyes. And then later, we will get into how transhumanism fits into this global grid and how the human being being grafted into this grid could possibly be the way to establish what we’ve knows as the Mark of the Beast.
But keep in mind that the freedom and solution to humanities shortcomings have already been overcome by Jesus Christ. El Elyon, The Most High God. El Shaddai, Lord God Almight. Yeshua Ha Machiach came in the flesh and revealed His plan for us. And so even though these posts and other projects I am embarking on may seem on the surface like fear mongering, ultimately it’s exposing the darkness, so that the true light may shine through. Yeshua our Savior.
[1] [2] [3] [4] Technocracy in Plain Terms: A Challenge and a Warning. New York: Technocracy Incorporated, 1939. Print.
[5] [6] Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era. New York: The Viking Press, 1970. Print.
Main source are found in the writings of Patrick Wood of August Forecast.
